What if neuroscience is an unknown problem space where boids are exploring? Technology, experiments, observations are increasing the problem space faster than it's being mapped.
What if theories of neuroscience are like product development? New bugs are being identified faster than they're being closed. So it'll be a while longer before the bug curve settles down.
What if science and engineering are like software design and architecture? It takes a while, plus lots of trial and error, to identify patterns, to generalize, to simplify. It's normal for code bases to "pulse", growing for a while as solutions are explored, then contracting for a while as dead ends are culled. aka technical debt.
What if theories of neuroscience are like product development? New bugs are being identified faster than they're being closed. So it'll be a while longer before the bug curve settles down.
What if science and engineering are like software design and architecture? It takes a while, plus lots of trial and error, to identify patterns, to generalize, to simplify. It's normal for code bases to "pulse", growing for a while as solutions are explored, then contracting for a while as dead ends are culled. aka technical debt.