On: Suspect can’t be compelled to reveal “64-character...

[Aeolun]

Of course he would have. This is a fantastic example of how everything you say, can and will be used against you.

But I think criminals being interrogated aren’t really of sound mind.

[XorNot → Aeolun]

They're not proven to be criminals at that stage. They're suspects, maybe, but no court has convicted them.

[Aeolun → XorNot]

Fair enough. But that doesn’t really change my argument?

[vageli → Aeolun]

> Fair enough. But that doesn’t really change my argument?

I think the point (which bears repeating) is that suspects are not criminals until proven so in a court, and it's important to be careful in our language, especially in our modern times where the court of public opinion operates swiftly and without due process.

[Aeolun → vageli]

It’s one thing if they deny the accusations, but if they agree with them...