It seems like the author is mostly talking about social security, rather than life itself. He also seems to be taking the stance of rerouting funding from other govt health spending such as disease research to social security.
While I don’t disagree with the author’s intentions, I do find his rhetoric and writing style pretty disappointing. Mentioning a general 12,000 year old trend of population growth as a supporting argument, and using a title that vague feels clickbaitey and loses credibility in the message to me.
While I don’t disagree with the author’s intentions, I do find his rhetoric and writing style pretty disappointing. Mentioning a general 12,000 year old trend of population growth as a supporting argument, and using a title that vague feels clickbaitey and loses credibility in the message to me.