Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think there's also an effect where some of us have gotten used to Python 2.7.x being utterly predictable and unchanging for like, the decade since it came out.

It's not Python's fault, but for example I was trying to get something running on Ubuntu 16.04 (Python 3.5) where the primary developer of it is running Ubuntu 18.04 (Python 3.6), and it seems like 3.5's version of the asyncio module has a bunch of bugs that make the tool in question basically unusable.

I know the usual advice— install newer Python from deadsnakes, use a virtualenv, etc. None of this stuff is the end of the world, but it can be jarring if you're only now getting off the Python 2.7 train and used to everything just working everywhere.




That's not really fair, though. If the developer were writing it on 2.7 and you were running it on 2.6, I wouldn't hold that against Python 2.


Oh I completely acknowledge that. This is less about Python and more "fast moving platform" vs "slow moving platform".


well asyncio was introduced in 3.5 though, it just happened that initial version was buggy and you should assume asyncio is available since 3.6 (or actually 3.5.3+)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: