I'm just saying that the way the article is written, it comes off as similar to 16th century theory of imbalance of humors [1].
It's just a very surface level explanation, lacking in substance as I said. There's something more concrete going on and this article didn't even attempt to illuminate it.
It's just a very surface level explanation, lacking in substance as I said. There's something more concrete going on and this article didn't even attempt to illuminate it.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humorism