On: Fibers aren’t useful for much any more

[dang]

Some of the comments refer to the paper at http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2018/p136..., which was the original submitted URL.

[erusset → dang]

There are also (at least) two relevant followups to this paper:

Response to “Fibers under the magnifying glass”: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p086...

Response to response to "Fibers under the magnifying glass": http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p152...

[johannkokos → dang]

"Response to 'Fibers under the magnifying glass'" from the authors of boost.fiber, at

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p086....

And Response to response to "Fibers under the magnifying glass", at

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2019/p152...

[gpderetta → johannkokos]

The saga of stackful corutines vs stackless coroutines Vs zero overhead coroutines has been going on in C++ land for a while now.

Gor so far seems to be ahead as stackless coroutines are part of the standard.

[barrkel → dang]

This is deeply weird for the conversation, IMO this should have been two separate stories.