I agree that the article doesn't reflect the reality of the situation. One must understand that the Wikipedia acticle's content is controlled by gatekeeping-editors who collectively agree on what they want it to say. Trying to change the narrative there is an uphill, literally rigged battle.
I am also suspicious that reporting on this new "spygate" story might be an attempt to muddy the SEO waters.
I am also suspicious that reporting on this new "spygate" story might be an attempt to muddy the SEO waters.