The look and feel of your site is great! Nice job! I agree with other commenters about the need for richer data. For example, just picking on the "top performing" site in your list (skysheet.com), here's the yottaa report on that site:
Yottaa notes a similar reachability time as stella does in the "Reachability > Washington" metric. But response time performance is significantly worse at other locations.
Also, it's important to track not just response time of the server, but actual browser performance. If you look at the Page Load Time metric, you'll see that even when the server responds pretty quickly, the actual browser experience is significantly worse than a simple HTTP Client.
Overall, I like the site a lot. If you could get some more accurate metrics, it'd be great. Keep going!
BTW> Here at Yottaa we're beta-ing an API that would let you run tests and access all of our browser and low level data. Would you be interested in getting some better data from us? Contact me : jrosoff AT yottaa DOT com
http://www.yottaa.com/url/skysheet-com-4d2ca049038ade0c05000...
Yottaa notes a similar reachability time as stella does in the "Reachability > Washington" metric. But response time performance is significantly worse at other locations.
Also, it's important to track not just response time of the server, but actual browser performance. If you look at the Page Load Time metric, you'll see that even when the server responds pretty quickly, the actual browser experience is significantly worse than a simple HTTP Client.
Overall, I like the site a lot. If you could get some more accurate metrics, it'd be great. Keep going!
BTW> Here at Yottaa we're beta-ing an API that would let you run tests and access all of our browser and low level data. Would you be interested in getting some better data from us? Contact me : jrosoff AT yottaa DOT com