Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Lots of businesses, particularly real estate businesses, feature self-dealing and family control galore. American corporate law goes out of its way to avoid criminalising stupidity.

Self-dealing, as in how the founder leases his building to his firm, or how he owned and sold the We trademark to his own firm? I wouldn't call that 'stupidity'. In fact, it sounds very smart, for the founder. And unethical bordering on criminal.




I've heard it's not uncommon to separate low-multiple assets and high-multiple assets into different structures.

In this case, the builds are the low-multiple assets and they're being separated out from the high-multiple asset which is the management company.


Imagine a huge conglomerate who has the ability to take revenues in more than one division - you claim the revenues in whatever the market treats as having a higher multiple, thus inflating your “growth” story and your stock price. To financial folks it looks like you’re shedding old businesses and making a new hit, but in reality it’s a finance trick.


Wouldn't the buildings usually be owned by, like, a subsidiary of WeWork, or a holding company that also owned WeWork, or something?


WeWork is the junk company that only exists to funnel investor money to the founder via his other company.




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: