Your response here directly conflicts with what you say in the opening paragraph.
Response to my comment:
>"our device it not assisting police it arresting people for owning or even selling cannabis, just using it before driving."
Product desription from original post:
>"... we're imagining a world where there are one of our devices in every police car in North America."
And it sounds like a dystopian nightmare. This isn't about improving anything but getting a slice of the pie that serves the law enforcement industrial complex. The same one that disproportionately targets minorities and those without the means to defend themselves in court.
And that's just the intended use case, much less other use cases that it's applied to.
Truly awful product idea that will make society much worse off.
Response to my comment:
>"our device it not assisting police it arresting people for owning or even selling cannabis, just using it before driving."
Product desription from original post:
>"... we're imagining a world where there are one of our devices in every police car in North America."
And it sounds like a dystopian nightmare. This isn't about improving anything but getting a slice of the pie that serves the law enforcement industrial complex. The same one that disproportionately targets minorities and those without the means to defend themselves in court.
And that's just the intended use case, much less other use cases that it's applied to.
Truly awful product idea that will make society much worse off.