Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

(1) What’s your take on the sustainability of these subsidized rides? -=>

The gigantic and unsustainable CAC numbers experienced by Uber, Lyft, and others is due to the present level of competition for these drivers & customers. This demand has been inflated for years fueled by Vision Fund and other late stage VC money with their winner takes all approach.

This cost has now been handed off (in the USA anyways) to Lyft & Uber stock holders. Somebody is going to run out of capital or experience a precipitous drop in stock valuation that will force the market's hand here and reduce demand and re-normalize.

It is financially unsustainable for this # to keep climbing as a percentage of revenue barring a massive change to the cost structures.

The only massive change imaginable in the structure was when Travis got away for a few years claiming autonomous would cure all, this is obviously not going to happen in the timeline he was pitching.

I think that the CEO taking a hard position and firing 400 people in his marketing department is a good indicator that when they next report earnings CAC is going to be a huge mess and maybe shed some light on how UBER plans to navigate that downshift.

(2) Will drivers still drive if this incentive is taken away? -=> Yes, following my comment above I think that the current CAC and retention numbers will normalize (for one or other other of the major players) and that the delta savings will be pushed back into increased driver wages.

(3) What are some of your favorite interesting insights from that data? -=> Outta steam sorry :)




>This demand has been inflated for years fueled by Vision Fund and other late stage VC money with their winner takes all approach.

Do you think it is even possible to have a winner takes all in the global hire car market? The barrier to entry is exceedingly low.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: