Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Never understood OpenShift.

If you don't use the serverless benefit of "not having to manage your own infra" what do you win?




Another Red Hat associate here... Using OpenShift doesn't necessarily mean managing your own infrastructure. There are a number of cloud-based managed OpenShift offerings out there from multiple vendors, including Microsoft. But you can also run it on-prem where it delivers tremendous value: better infra utilization, agility, security, productivity, portability, etc. Simply decoupling the lifecycle of the app from the lifecycle of the host is a huge win for many enterprises.


the latest incarnation of openshift is basically just a bundling of kubernetes. like GKE or EKS, but on-prem.

the hybrid-cloud dream therefore is to target k8s as your runtime, and then spread your workload across N cloud vendors and on-prem resources.

regardless of if you think that's a good plan or not, its the perfect sales pitch to the fortune 500 cto who doesn't want to go all-in on "the cloud" but realizes he has to "do something".


But you can swing a cat and hit eight k8s bundlers. Why is anyone going to want to use IBMs if they aren't already in the clutches of IBM or RH?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: