Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> was a retrospective on how it had gone wrong in notable cases.

> highlighting that even sympathetic coverage thinks the approach is a mixed bag in practice.

You mean "how a statistically non-significant number of cases lead to the usual results in our modern outrage culture"? You will always have cases where it doesn't work. That's why statistics are important. But statistics don't sell, what sells is "SEE, WE GAVE THIS GUY FREE HOUSING AND HE DID THIS HORRIBLE THING"




I believe the homeless (and everyone else), should be prosecuted in full for crimes they commit.

I think there are two types of homeless - those who are sane and normal but down on their luck - once they get a job and support they can be contributing members of society. These individuals need all the support we can give them.

The second type of homeless, sometimes referred to as homeless by choice, those individuals who are drug addicted or mentally unstable to the point they can't even keep it together to get a government check need to be handled differently. I think we should have some form of long term holds for these people until they truly show they can survive and flourish without it.

Cities are becoming overrun with the second type of homeless. These people are generally filthy, spread disease, commit various crimes of opportunity even including assault and murder and rape, and abuse drugs and alcohol until they die.

I suggest we categorize the second type of homeless by issue involved and severity and have mandatory facilities to either help them recover or simply hold them long term. Categories could include various levels of drug addiction rehab, mental health, etc.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: