Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> it was about privacy

Yes, and adblockers, umatrix/noscript, Tor, and other add-ons were universally broken.

That has an impact on privacy too.




So how many of Mozilla's policies need to be appended with "unless we think it's important enough"? All of them? Just the ones violated this time?


The implied distinction is that adherence to principle is what distinguishes Mozilla from Google. If Mozilla is willing to sell out its principles on this instance, then when else will it be willing to sell out its principles?


It's not like people didn't tell Mozilla about the potential for problems like this when signing was added.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: