> The policies that using Studies in this way violated are listed in my initial post.
You just claimed they had violated their privacy policy, not the shield studies guidelines. Your initial post doesn't say anything about their privacy policy. And as I said, your privacy wasn't affected at all if you didn't enable the studies yourself, so your point about rather waiting doesn't make sense either.
> You might think violating them was justified, but that they were in fact violated is inarguable.
You could argue that testing the fix meets the first two conditions you listed. I don't know if they actually provided that "Product Hypothesis Doc", but at that point you're really just looking for something to complain about.
You just claimed they had violated their privacy policy, not the shield studies guidelines. Your initial post doesn't say anything about their privacy policy. And as I said, your privacy wasn't affected at all if you didn't enable the studies yourself, so your point about rather waiting doesn't make sense either.
> You might think violating them was justified, but that they were in fact violated is inarguable.
You could argue that testing the fix meets the first two conditions you listed. I don't know if they actually provided that "Product Hypothesis Doc", but at that point you're really just looking for something to complain about.