I would personally be open to all of those, but I feel like it's something that would be good 10% of the time, and pretty problematic 90% of the time.
I can see an argument made for licensing cyclist who want to ride on non-residential roads. These sort of cyclists though are unlikely to injure anyone but themselves, so there's not a lot to be ganied from it.
The idea of requiring a 5-year-old to get licensed so they can ride around in front of their appartment building/house seems a little bizzare.
Vehicle licensing depends on the kind of vehicle and how easy it is to accidentally kill or maim people with it in it's normal operation. This is very easy with the DMV registered vehicles, it's not that easy with a bike.
I can see an argument made for licensing cyclist who want to ride on non-residential roads. These sort of cyclists though are unlikely to injure anyone but themselves, so there's not a lot to be ganied from it.
The idea of requiring a 5-year-old to get licensed so they can ride around in front of their appartment building/house seems a little bizzare.
Vehicle licensing depends on the kind of vehicle and how easy it is to accidentally kill or maim people with it in it's normal operation. This is very easy with the DMV registered vehicles, it's not that easy with a bike.