I understand your point but what I wrote is the strongest possible interpretation of his comment that is possible for an atheist like me.
That's exactly what he said for me. That the terminally ill child should avoid distractions that lessen his suffering just to have time to reflect on his short and troubled life because death might not be the end and there might be some consequences after that which is completely supernatural reason flying in the face of all available evidence.
That's exactly what he said for me. That the terminally ill child should avoid distractions that lessen his suffering just to have time to reflect on his short and troubled life because death might not be the end and there might be some consequences after that which is completely supernatural reason flying in the face of all available evidence.