Naive in the sense that they only address issues such as blocking LAN networks and email spam traffic and there is zero mention of what happens when someone anonymously abuse the service.
The volunteer effort is laudable and quite refreshing but can a VPN relying on volunteers be ignorant of the risks those volunteers incur when they open their connection to anonymous traffic?
I understand that this is an issue that every VPN has to face but there should at least be some mention of how that particular VPN service handles law enforcement and abuse requests, or do they expect the volunteers to face the consequences?
Maybe I’m missing that point and it’s clarified somewhere?
The volunteer effort is laudable and quite refreshing but can a VPN relying on volunteers be ignorant of the risks those volunteers incur when they open their connection to anonymous traffic?
I understand that this is an issue that every VPN has to face but there should at least be some mention of how that particular VPN service handles law enforcement and abuse requests, or do they expect the volunteers to face the consequences?
Maybe I’m missing that point and it’s clarified somewhere?