Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

While the cameras in the article seem to run on some stupid software that doesn’t help, I don’t think I would have cared as a student about cameras in general. In fact I may have appreciated the fact that cameras mean the teachers can’t get away with the privilege of being more trustworthy than the kids.

Catching cheaters would be nice. Catching bullies would be nice. Reducing the rate of false sexual assault claims and actual sexual assault (my year had one of each teacher:student).

But... it probably opens doors to worse things. Dumb cameras would be good. Smart cameras would be bad. As would software run over the dumb cameras.




You seriously believe there wouldn't have been a "technical problem" if it saves the teachers or school some trouble?


When teachers and administrators are the only one with access to the camera system, they can choose to look the other way and use the panopticon of surveillance only on the students.

Meanwhile, the disempowered students can complain all they want, which will just encourage administrators to crack down more using their new camera system.


Sometimes but probably less than the majority of incidents for a fixed static camera system feels appropriate. Not to mention deterrent effects.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: