The thing that's nice about the Journal's bias though is that it's clear. That's why I like financial journalism (e.g. Bloomberg). Their bias is apparent: Make more money for corporations. It's easy to correct for, and once you understand that, it's easy to parse the signal. Reading other publications it's more difficult to understand what their perspective is, and therefore more difficult to correct for it.
As mentioned by another comment, their bias is clear. They also provide a very clear distinction between opinion/editorial content and reporting. Their reporting is typically non-partisan, or even slightly left-of-center.
Anti-regulation response: "Thanks. I will evaluate it on its merits with the responsibility being mine."
Pro-regulation response: "Oh, was it regulated? No? No thanks. I only accept regulated things otherwise I have to accept responsibility for my own evaluation."
What always strikes me as odd is how the US discourse around regulations stays always on a hypothetical level, while literally 50 other states have regulations for decades and know where it works and where not.
This feels a little like discussing whether airplanes are a realistic means of transportation while the rest of the world uses them for years and isn’t really a rational approach towards reality, but rationalizing ones believes. Airplanes are made by the devil, therefore they can’t be good.
The way this discourse unfolds in the US says more about the state of the nation than it says about the practicability of any regulation.
Can you fuck up things with overregulating? Sure thing! Can you fuck things up by not regulating? Sure thing! And while hitting the right balance can be tricky at times, this is not a theoretical matter you can observe it empirical and ask yourself if it works.
I know the tribal partisan divide in the US leads some to leave their head at the door, but come on, this is just silly.
For example they have an anti-regulation bias that they wear on their sleeve editorially and which informs their news reporting.
You might consider the possibility that you like it better because it is consistent with your world view rather than because it is less biased.