Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

   What non-nefarious reasons would GitHub have for making these decisions?
GitHub is owned by Microsoft now- they can afford to do this at a loss / zero sum amount because Microsoft thinks it's a good idea.

As long as Microsoft is being altruistic here, we should be fine.

I think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: