The post-mortem hasn't happened yet. ekr's post is a preliminary description of what happened, everything he felt confident saying in advance of the post-mortem and so necessarily heavy on technical details but light on process details.
I mean, it's fair to say it's oversight? I wonder if the post-mortem will reveal if it was on someone's radar and slipped through the cracks or if it was never put into the schedule system they use for certification expiration to begin with.
Yes I saw that, I just wish he had mentioned this at the top of the post (which currently reads " I wanted to walk through the details of what happened, why, and how we repaired it.") instead of near the bottom.
