Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Wow, this article by the New York times is so different than what news have reported in the UK here. It reads like a cheap tabloit newspaper aimed at getting people angry over an issue by purposefully leaving out facts and details which I would consider borderline lies.

The new law is aimed not for any crime victims, but specifically rape and serious sexual offence victims.

> "It comes after a number of rape and serious sexual assault cases collapsed when crucial evidence emerged."

I'd recommend reading this instead: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48086244




i) it's not new

ii) it's not law, it's guidance

iii) it's not specifically rape and sexual offences, it's all crime when it's relevant.

Here's the CPS press release: https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/handing-over-mobile-phone-da...

I agree the press coverage has been terrible.


That article doesn't make it sound any better. If anything it brings up more problems. Text a friend about a rape fantasy years ago and a rapist may go free.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: