Some common interview types are algorithm problems, pair programming exercises, take-home assignments, etc.
Has there been any research into the predictive power of such assessments? Is there any evidence that a particular type of question correlates well with job success?
> The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 100 Years
> This article summarizes the practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research in personnel selection. On the basis of meta-analytic findings, this article presents the validity of 19 selection procedures for predicting job performance and training performance and the validity of paired combinations of general mental ability (GMA) and the 18 other selection procedures. Overall, the 3 combinations with the highest multivariate validity and utility for job performance were GMA plus a work sample test (mean validity of .63), GMA plus an integrity test (mean validity of .65), and GMA plus a structured interview (mean validity of .63). A further advantage of the latter 2 combinations is that they can be used for both entry level selection and selection of experienced employees. The practical utility implications of these summary findings are substantial. The implications of these research findings for the development of theories of job performance are discussed.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Validity-and-Utili...