Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I was actually quite disappointed that they settled at the last minute, as we no longer have access to juicy legal discovery that would have revealed Apple's rotten legal strategies and bad-faith practices. Now it's slowly becoming apparent that Apple fabricated evidences and tricked Qualcomm into legal troubles with regulators (eg, rebates for exclusivity) -- which is why QCOM stopped paying Apple rebates.

I don't think Apple is giving up its unscrupulous practices, however, and I'm pretty sure they are setting themselves up for the next battle years from now (Apple is now a direct licensee). In hindsight, QCOM should have taken lessons from Samsung's battle with Apple years back. There were so many red flags from the moment the FTC approved antitrust investigation of QCOM just days ahead of a new administration with 2 of the 5 commissioners missing, against the vehement dissent from the interim chair. I just have to wonder what's in their new licensing/business agreement -- if QCOM had to make concessions like it did before and it's another legal or regulatory minefield.




I know Apple gets lots of support from HN, but the company has serious ethics problems.

While fans brush it off as 'marketing', they would not give Google such a pass.

And... lets not forget, the FBI did break into their device. They don't win the privacy game when their device failed to be secure.


> They don't win the privacy game when their device failed to be secure.

If given the choice between hanging out with the guy who committed an accidental homicide and a serial killer, I know which one I'd pick.


serial killer?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: