Amsterdam is an interesting example. Is Amsterdam asking anyone else to subsidize them? From what I've read they made a conscious decision that the pumping, levees and related was worth the cost of the extra acres of land they provided.
New Orleans seems to be arguing that it only makes sense if 75% of it is paid by someone else... forever.
a lot of of economic activity in NL is below sea level.
No, Amsterdam did not directly pay for it. But yes, the most profitable regions contributed the most.
New Orleans seems to be arguing that it only makes sense if 75% of it is paid by someone else... forever.