He actually made the same gut bacteria connection to autism patients that this new research found. His paper had to be personally signed off by the 13 other researchers working on it. It was retracted by the publisher due to a conflict with a sponsor but was never scientifically denounced. He then checked the safety records around the vaccine and said he cant recommend the vaccine based on the testing. There are tons of people currently associated with him and you can hear him out any time with any number of recent appearances
So people are glibly conflating insufficiency of result with bad intent. I always understood that from mainstream news. You have to know how to read the news :) Once you predict the bias, herd-following, yellow journalism etc. you can filter it out.
