On: 339 Bytes of Responsive CSS

[pocketarc]

Bear in mind, the parent is talking about the page where this article is posted, not the CSS itself or the font.

[stupidthrottle → pocketarc]

As an end-user... why should I care if the bloat I download is CSS, or assets pulled via the CSS?

There’s literally no distinction.

[pocketarc → stupidthrottle]

We're talking about different pages - one is the page with the blog post about this 339 bytes of responsive CSS (it's 2+MB). The other is the demo page with 339 bytes of CSS + the web font. The former is what the parent was talking about.