On: 339 Bytes of Responsive CSS

[smoyer]

Yep ... the first thing I did was to see if he was "eating his own dog-food". As an aside, I'd recommend against putting the linked site on a projector at work (or at least look at it first to determine whether it fits your organization's culture).

[youngtaff → smoyer]

I think most projectors would have a problem displaying the text in a readable way - the line width is so fine

[arkokoley → smoyer]

> I'd recommend against putting the linked site on a projector at work

Is it because of the linked site?

[arkokoley → arkokoley]

@purerandomnesss OP here. Copied that from http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/

I think, I should probably change the text.

[smoyer → arkokoley]

Yes ... I didn't even think about the fact that "linked site" is ambiguous in this case. I wonder if you can play the "six degrees of separation" game (Kevin Bacon) with web-sites. How many links do you need to follow to get from any random site to any other? If the web is fully connected, then "linked site" is fully ambiguous!

[maccard → arkokoley]

Yes, definitely. He's talking about [0]. It's really unprofessional (which is a pity because it's impressive!)

[0] - https://blog.koley.in/baserock/

[purerandomness → arkokoley]

It's because of the linked example in OP's link: https://blog.koley.in/baserock/