Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The choice to attack/blame 100% of the countries problems on 50% of the voting population doesn't feel justified.



Fair enough. However why did the republican administration pick a specialist in tax evasion for the position of IRS commissioner?


That in itself doesn't necessarily mean ill intent. Someone who knows what to go after can be very useful, if they chose to utilize that knowledge.

Also, the IRS is big, the commissioner does not decide cases, however it issues policy memos, which have a large influence on enforcement. And these are usually public and or can be FOIA-ed.

So all in all, their pick is very much a political ally, and that he/she happens to be a tax specialist is just a convenient factor. (So that the man is fit to deal with IRS stuff.)


Let me roll a dice through history were one side of the political spectrum has harmed the other.


Republicans are not even close to 50% of the voting population.


Honestly, I'm not sure what this means.


You're the one that brought up "50% of the voting population".

Trump only got 46% of the popular vote.

The Republican Senate majority represents 18% of the population.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: