Other than moral connotation and RMS being the way he is, Open Source is just business friendly rebranding of Free Software. Is there anything else to the "FSF model" that is different from OSI proposition?
I don't buy the FSF position that Open Source is only about efficiency, collaboration etc and that Free Software is superior - it is the same thing, albeit different language but the concepts are identical. Playing moral superiority is only counterproductive to FSF. Btw I wish them to succeed even if that might literally mean becoming a tax exempt church so that we could all be praying by the holy book of Emacs.
For GPL'd software you're required to share your changes, for open source software you aren't. That's a big difference, especially for a business that wants to sell their changes.
So when people say open source is business friendly, they don't mean that the vibe is business friendly, they mean that it removes a restriction and allows more avenues to make money.
I don't buy the FSF position that Open Source is only about efficiency, collaboration etc and that Free Software is superior - it is the same thing, albeit different language but the concepts are identical. Playing moral superiority is only counterproductive to FSF. Btw I wish them to succeed even if that might literally mean becoming a tax exempt church so that we could all be praying by the holy book of Emacs.