> In theory losses on derivatives would be offset by gains in the value of Apple’s underlying business. But the sheer size of these positions gives pause for thought.
What's the point of this article? Apple is so big that its derivatives for protection from FX volatility are so big?
What does the author suggests here; that they stop protecting against FX volatility?
What's the point of this article? Apple is so big that its derivatives for protection from FX volatility are so big?
What does the author suggests here; that they stop protecting against FX volatility?