Terrible title (especially with the capitalisation), but very sound article.
On the technical side, I wonder if a new DNS system outside of US control wouldn't be a good thing. Presumably, the best DNS system would be decentralised in some fashion... This might lead to a difficult transition period, but the end result (an internet where domain names are basically uncensorable by any government) would be very desirable.
The bill doesn't rely on DNS and moving the DNS system outside of the USA wouldn't stop COICA from working.
COICA works by forcing American ISPs to block their users' access to a list of domains. It mandates 2 lists; one where ISPs won't be punished for blocking and a second list where ISPs are forced to block. It's very close to implementing what China has with their Great Firewall. It's censorship plain and simple.
You could do it just like SSL - have a set of "root servers" hosted in multiple countries. Each netizen an then decide which internet he wants to access and pick the right root servers (obviously preselected by default to include the most reputable ones).
Technically, if Google is indexing sites accused of wrongdoing, the MPAA could force Google itself to filter search results (or serve them with a court order to do so).
On a wider scale, if you link to a site that links to another site, would you still be liable?
it's great to see IEEE spectrum laying out the technical issues so clearly along with the legal perspectives. it's something that any startup in the web space needs to be tracking to understand the likely risks moving forward.
On the technical side, I wonder if a new DNS system outside of US control wouldn't be a good thing. Presumably, the best DNS system would be decentralised in some fashion... This might lead to a difficult transition period, but the end result (an internet where domain names are basically uncensorable by any government) would be very desirable.
I wonder what that would look like.