I hope GitHub stakeholders will never read that article. It's full of nonsense. The author doesn't know what he's talking about in this particular case.
Commits, branches, releases, contributors belong exclusively to Code! There are no releases in Wiki.
The GitHub design is perfect and it should stay like that forever :-)
I hate those designers who try to "fresh up" things every single month. Is it because they cannot create something valuable?
I was just getting used to the latest icons in my IDE and next month they "fresh it up" and I have no idea what is what.
GitHub has been around for years, it gets the job done, everyone is used to it and knows how it works. Let it stay like that!
The only thing that I'm missing sometimes is file tree. But one can get it with the help of Octotree extension.
Commits, branches, releases, contributors belong exclusively to Code! There are no releases in Wiki. The GitHub design is perfect and it should stay like that forever :-)
I hate those designers who try to "fresh up" things every single month. Is it because they cannot create something valuable? I was just getting used to the latest icons in my IDE and next month they "fresh it up" and I have no idea what is what.
GitHub has been around for years, it gets the job done, everyone is used to it and knows how it works. Let it stay like that!
The only thing that I'm missing sometimes is file tree. But one can get it with the help of Octotree extension.