> The first thing they do is even try to convince you that entrepreneurship isn't the most profitable path. The statistically best path is to work at an early stage company.
That's just them, being self-interested since they need employees for their founders' startups more than they need new founders.
Realistically, the most profitable path statistically is to work at a FLNG or decacorn.
Agreed. I'm completely skeptical that the expected return is higher for "early stage startup" vs large tech co or "decacorn" (love that term, btw) and investing in index funds and maybe some real estate.
That's just them, being self-interested since they need employees for their founders' startups more than they need new founders.
Realistically, the most profitable path statistically is to work at a FLNG or decacorn.