Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

[flagged]



That's not how the 1st Amendment works:

>Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; [...]


Nope. Please inform yourself what "free-speech" means.


And be nuanced. Freedom of speech is an American ideal, and a Constitutional Amendment.


I make no argument against YouTube being basically a free-speech zone, and I wouldn't suggest banning people for purely ideological reasons, because I agree that that would be against the American Ideal.

That said, if I were hosting my own video-sharing website, there's no way in hell I would recommend a white-supremacist video, or even a flat-earth video. If people find it on their own, that's on them, but for the same reason that I personally wouldn't pass along flyers for thedailystormer, I wouldn't promote someone like Alex Jones.


For the same reason that the NY Times is not required to platform white supremacists, and the same reason that I don't have to host Nazi Propaganda on my website, it is part of YouTube's free speech to platform whomever they want.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: