Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Slack and Github were so worried about someone cybersquatting that they were willing to pay $11,500 each to get those domains today? I guess that's the point of the Dutch auction system, but still seems like a waste of money.



For Microsoft (which owns GitHub) that is a tiny expense, but if they couldn't really afford it they could just file a dispute under UDRP.


But does the money come from Microsoft or from GitHub?

In a lot of the large companies I've worked, money is siloed from one operating unit to the next. They would send bills between units and sometimes even departments.

The larger the company, the more common this seemed. It's not one giant piggy bank.


Does it really matter? Surely $11k is still a tiny amount for GitHub.


~One month salary for a senior dev.


Junior most likely


If you buy the domain during trademark holder's period, you pay the normal price, and not the day 1 landrush price. So no, Slack et. al. did not pay $11,500 to secure their name.


The sunrise period for trademark owners was a whole month until today, with a much more reasonable price tag.


That makes more sense. I had missed that there was a sunrise period for the .dev tld.


Sunrise periods are required for all new gTLDs by ICANN.


11k for a large company barely registers on their radar.


It's the cost of coffee for a couple of days or so.


Is this Venezuelan coffee?

https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-venezuela-cafe-con-l...

But note I think you mean the $12 price but that’s only available from the 28th Feb. To buy today it is $11,500 (unless as others have pointed out you got it as part of the trademark sunrise period)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: