My rough eyeballing of this seems to hint more of an extension to dcma: but instead of a takedown, the owner/author can do a money grab instead?
Isn't this already the mess that YouTube has, with copyright claims taking a good chunk of a video's revenue?
My rough eyeballing of this seems to hint more of an extension to dcma: but instead of a takedown, the owner/author can do a money grab instead? Isn't this already the mess that YouTube has, with copyright claims taking a good chunk of a video's revenue?