On: Replacing JavaScript Hot Path with WebAssembly

[vijaybritto]

I think its fast because of the L1 cache or something like that. I dont understand fully but this is what i got

[acqq → vijaybritto]

The fastest version is the fastest because it's the most cache-friendly one of all which were presented. See e.g.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5200338/a-cache-efficien...

But note that robko made an improvement even before making that.

[acqq → acqq]

> made an improvement even before

Or maybe not: my short experiments with the simplified version based on their algorithm and his JavaScript versions gave some conflicting results. I haven't thoroughly verified them, this note is just to motivate the others to try.