Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Fiberbots: Design of a multi-agent, fiber composite digital fabrication system (media.mit.edu)
44 points by eaguyhn on Feb 5, 2019 | hide | past | favorite | 12 comments



Here's an industrial scale version already in use in China.[1] This process is called filament winding. The MIT group is just doing it with a slightly different mechanism than usual.

[1] https://www.frpmachine.com/frpmachine/vertical-frp-tank-wind...


Took me a minute to understand the mechanism behind these devices. Interested to see how the idea could be applied to practical applications.


Cool technology, but I don't see yet how this could be superior to other construction methods in any practical way.


Could some one explain what 'digital' means in this context?


The design is expressed in data and executed with minimal Human intervention.

Much like 2D printing, 3D printing etc.


I thought that, but 3d printing isn't digital printing, CNC manufacture isn't digital manufacture.

3d printing, or additive manufacture seem to be more descriptive, as less likely to be confused with actual digital things?


There is an increase in the ratio of work performed in the digital domain, rather than through physical processing, often making things more efficient, easier or cheaper.

Like with the transition from an analog printing process (including shooting, developing etc photos) to the digital one.


Yes I understand. But take my CNC example, you design on a computer, a computer cuts out the pieces. If it's mass production, a robot could put the pieces together. This doesn't digitise anymore of the process.

I can understand the use of 'digital' to refer to a novel use of computing, such as your digital photography example. But that's a transitory use, digital photography is now just photography. But again though this doesn't seem to go any further than a CNC or 3d printer.

So I'm here confused as to why they've used that word, because it doesn't seem to add anything, which suggests it was probably the wrong word (or I'm misunderstanding something).


The process of choosing the name of a commercial product will (should) always contain some degree of marketing. Another, quite funny example:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming#History

More generally, it is quite difficult (out of chemistry at least) to maintain names that describe things to the point that you can “reason” about the chosen symbol. The space is too crowded, etimologies lose their stronghold on meaning when context is added to words, etc. One person chooses with more or less foresight the name of something, and from then on it is just inertia, fashion, and meme evolution that drive names. It is better to not think a lot about why the name of X is Y, out of curiosity, lest you end up frustrated with how random it is.


Perhaps you're right :sigh:


Digital fabrication/manufacturing is a collective term used for any kind of process where the digital model is transformed into a physical piece with minimal human intervention.

Digital model -> (digital fabrication) -> fabricated object.

Examples are CNC mills, lasercutting, waterjet, FDM/SLS/SLA 3d-printing, plasmacutter, CNC sheet bending machines, etc. The article uses the term to indicate that it belongs in this category of manufacturing technology. Not that it is any more digital than the rest of them.


"digital" seems to be used in the context of largely automated not-mass-production.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: