I am the founder of DevCheatSheet. Pleasantly surprised to see my site on Hacker News again. Thanks bemmu!
I'm happy to answer any questions you may have about the site. Also, let me know if you have any feedback.
To answer some of the common questions/feedback:
* So far I have been focused on adding content, but now the site needs some sort of filtering to identify the relative value of each cheat sheet and easily find what you are looking for. I am still exploring different options for this including: page-rank type popularity scores, HN-style up/down voting, or traditional user star ratings.
* Every cheat sheet is manually reviewed. I don't add every single page that calls itself a cheat sheet. There is definitely a wide range of quality, but this is somewhat inevitable given this is user-generated content aggregated from around the web. This is not necessarily a bad thing: for example, an obscure topic might only have one single low-quality cheat sheet, but this is still useful and better than no results.
Would be a much more useful site if it had some sort of editorial standard, rather than "let's find as many pages that people call cheat sheets and shove them together in a huge directory".
Looks like a nice passive-income site idea, using OPC (other people's content) to drive affiliate and ad clicks. I'm betting they're looking for everything they can find that can possibly be called a cheat sheet.
I'm happy to answer any questions you may have about the site. Also, let me know if you have any feedback.
To answer some of the common questions/feedback:
* So far I have been focused on adding content, but now the site needs some sort of filtering to identify the relative value of each cheat sheet and easily find what you are looking for. I am still exploring different options for this including: page-rank type popularity scores, HN-style up/down voting, or traditional user star ratings.
* Every cheat sheet is manually reviewed. I don't add every single page that calls itself a cheat sheet. There is definitely a wide range of quality, but this is somewhat inevitable given this is user-generated content aggregated from around the web. This is not necessarily a bad thing: for example, an obscure topic might only have one single low-quality cheat sheet, but this is still useful and better than no results.