that's a pretty nice red herring you've introduced there my friend!
you haven't addressed any of the points i've brought up, but instead introduced a very tangential (possibly true) fact.
reflect for a moment on what i've said above. you are introducing a dichotomy that isn't accurate and justifying it by saying "something is better than nothing", which is the same corporate rationale for having a .000001% tax rate, states going crazy to attract huge companies, and so forth.
you haven't addressed any of the points i've brought up, but instead introduced a very tangential (possibly true) fact.
reflect for a moment on what i've said above. you are introducing a dichotomy that isn't accurate and justifying it by saying "something is better than nothing", which is the same corporate rationale for having a .000001% tax rate, states going crazy to attract huge companies, and so forth.