Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> on the phone

This should be an option, not the only way to cancel.




Why? I’m surprised at the downvotes I got on my original comment.

The Dropbox online cancellation, like many others, is a deceptive, tricky option designed to make you think that you cancelled when you did not to rip you off. Dropbox isn’t unusual.

Why is a phone call so evil? It’s bizarre to me that a arguably marginal inconvenience is more noxious than active trickery.


Can you imagine a business that insisted on a phone call to begin a subscription? Like, say the NYT website had just a phone number instead of a link and a form.

That would severely reduce their circulation.

The whole reason the signup flow is done entirely online is because its simpler and more convenient for both the subscriber and the provider.

Which tells you why they don't offer the cancel flow through the same medium. Because it's too easy. They want to add friction and inconvenience to the cancellation.

It's not as bad as many gyms ("you must (snail) mail a form to our headquarters to cancel"), but it's a step in that direction.


> Can you imagine a business that insisted on a phone call to begin a subscription?

Very clean way to illustrate the ridiculousness.


I want to cancel my subscription. I don't want to explain why to a pleading sales rep telling me about all the great things I'm going to miss while they "pull up my account".


Well, at least in California, it is outright illegal (from SB-313).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: