First, the argument is that if people do not have free will, they have no moral worth, yet society has moral worth. But no reason is given why society, composed of individuals rendered worthless, isn't also rendered worthless.
Secondarily, learning doesn't require free will, as empirally demonstrated by our pitiful machines today.
You have to state your axioms up front, and frankly the "news" of no free will is the greatest carte blanche to redesign morality anyways.
First, the argument is that if people do not have free will, they have no moral worth, yet society has moral worth. But no reason is given why society, composed of individuals rendered worthless, isn't also rendered worthless.
Secondarily, learning doesn't require free will, as empirally demonstrated by our pitiful machines today.
You have to state your axioms up front, and frankly the "news" of no free will is the greatest carte blanche to redesign morality anyways.