Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Targeted ads are a significant revenue source for all of these companies. That also doesn't explain why Google's stack is harder to leave than the rest.



> Targeted ads are a significant revenue source for all of these companies

I'd like to see some documentation for that claim. Company financial reports? What percentage of Apple or Microsoft revenue comes from selling ads or user data? (Not revenue raised indirectly by them spending on their own advertising)

> that also doesn't explain why Google's stack is harder to leave than the rest.

Parent comment wasn't comparing the difficulty of leaving Google with the difficulty of leaving Apple/Microsoft. The comment was about leaving Google in comparison to leaving Facebook, in the context of a discussion about personal privacy.

I think bringing up Apple & Microsoft is a non sequitur in this context.


I don't believe they release the numbers but they have app search ads and news app ads. They shutdown iAd but it looks like they want to take another crack at it. https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-looks-to-expand-advertisi...

Microsoft owns LinkedIn and Bing which very large ad revenue services.

>I think bringing up Apple & Microsoft is a non sequitur in this context.

Bringing up Google alone was the non sequitur. You could argue its nearly impossible to leave the big three all together but switching between them isn't a significant burden.


How does Apple make money from targeted ads?


Same way everyone else does. Apple has search ads, news ads, they had iAd for a while but that was shut down and it seems they're pushing a new replacement https://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-looks-to-expand-advertisi...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: