On: Fortran is still a thing

[z3phyr]

I heard my old physics professor say "In FORTRAN GOD is real"

[jabl → z3phyr]

... "but not LOGICAL".

[celrod → z3phyr]

Actually, almost all Fortran code says "implicit none".

[zoomablemind → celrod]

> Actually, almost all Fortran code says "implicit none".

... which would render GOD as of undeclared type. Compilers are such 'agnostics'.

[wycy → celrod]

Modern code often does, but I still see a lot of retro FORTRAN that maddeningly relies on implicits.