> From what little I've used Haskell, the strings-as-list paradigm was exceptionally useful.
It's useful from a convenience of programming point of view. The preferred underlying implementation is now something more sophisticated than a linked list of characters. See Data.ByteString. The programmer does not need to care much, though.
It's useful from a convenience of programming point of view. The preferred underlying implementation is now something more sophisticated than a linked list of characters. See Data.ByteString. The programmer does not need to care much, though.