Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Hey, there's more!

First, why "d"? Well, "d" is for "difference". As in: as x changes from x_1 to x_2, the difference (x_2 - x_1) -- when it's very small.

But wait, there's more!

The commonly used symbols for finite difference like that is the Greek letter Delta: Δ

For a list of values x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4,.. we write Δx_i = (x_i - x_{i-1}). That is, Δx_i is the i'th change. (Side note: an airline had a marketing slogan Change is Delta, which some nerd must have been immensely proud of).

Ok, bear with me for a bit more!

The symbol we use for finite sums is Σ: we write Σy_i = y_1 + y_2 + ... + y_n

Why Σ? That will have to wait a little.

Sums and differences cancel out:

ΣΔy_i = (y_1 - y_0) + (y_2 - y_1) + (y_3 - y_2) + ... + (y_n - y_{n-1}) = y_n - y_0

That is, summing up small succesive changes gives you total change. Simple?

Now apply this to the situation where the small changes in the quantity you are looking at are proportional to changes in another:

Δy_i = Δx_i * f(x_i)

Say, y is position, x is time; then f(x_i) is the speed at time x_i: as time increases a little, so does your position; the ratio of the changes is the speed. Δy_i is how much you moved from time x_{i-1} to time x_i, which is proportional to change in time Δx_i.

Note that f(x_i) = Δy_i/Δx_i here (speed = change in position div. by change in time).

Now write:

y_n - y_0 = ΣΔy_i = Σf(x_i)Δx_i

Again, just summing up small changes to get the net chnage.

NOW, what you've been waiting for!

Imagine you took infinitely many measurements. The changes become infinitely small, and the sum becomes of infinitely many things.

We need new notation for this.

But let's keep it similar. Instead of using Greek letters, let's use the same letters... in Latin.

Δx becomes dx

ΣΔy becomes S dy

And, with some sloppy handwriting of the letter S, the net change equation becomes:

y_final - y_initial = ∫ f(x)dx

where

f(x) = dy/dx.

You now see that Σ and the sloppy S -- ∫ -- stand for Sum.

And that, my friend, is pretty much all there is to Calculus and its symbols, fundamentally[1].

[1]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_calcu...




Do you realize this comment of yours is worth more than years of studying (high school + Bc.)? Perhaps schools are better at your location but the ones I've attended never explained this, just write that down, this equals that, memorize and f-ck you. Thanks G-d we have the Internet and people like you nowadays...


I think that Knuth's concrete mathematics made this connection at some point - the difference between the infinitely small abstraction of an integral and a big-sigma sum as being discreet quantities that can be measured by actual numbers that measure a thing.


I remember when I had calculus in school and the textbook was a huge book weighing like five pounds...and my mom's calculus textbook from the 1950s was this tiny little thin book. But they hadn't added anything to the subject of calculus since then!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: