Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Other posters seem to have concerns about google siphoning data from this product. I wouldn’t be especially worried about that.

A much bigger concern for me would be that this product is not and will never be core to google’s business. Will it be around a year from now? Will be around but utterly neglected as whatever opaque process inside google causes it to lose interest in yet another project?

I’d rather buy recruiting software from a company in the recruiting software business.




>A much bigger concern for me would be that this product is not and will never be core to google’s business.

I think it depends. Is this an internal tool they decided to monetize? If they're dogfooding it's much less likely they'll cancel it


Google most certainly does not use this extremely SMB tool to recruit and hire for themselves at any relevant scale.


> If they're dogfooding it's much less likely they'll cancel it

I think it's just as likely. Another team will create a different product doing the same thing in a different way and they will now dogfood that new one.


.... umm, no.

If anything they will just change it up and disappoint people who liked it just the way it was.

As they are doing with GMail.

They did create “Inbox” to do the same thing as GMail (email) in a different way... But they’re killing Inbox and just making changes to GMail.


...which kind of pisses me off because I use Inbox.


This looks like a bonus freebie for gsuite users who up til now didn't care to use any applicant tracking service.


Which is a bit weird because the main buyer of G Suite is a CIO, and presumably its Finance/Payroll/HR making the final decision on the hiring software.


Hiring employees efficiently is likely a part of Google's core business and practice.


I have always thought that Google generally siphons data from the product and once they have enough of the data that they need then the project they shut it down.


>* I have always thought that Google generally siphons data from the product and once they have enough of the data that they need then the project they shut it down. *

Or if the tool competes with another. I think Reader was killed mainly because it competed with Google Plus.

In general, I've noticed many sites now lack RSS feeds - probably because it's better to have users perpetually engaged than give a definitive list of articles that can be read in 1 go.


I don't remember a time when many sites didn't lack RSS feeds.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: