You compared the company to dog shit, even the best of which won't make its owner any money. Yet, this company, with a $75B valuation, clearly has made its owner some money.
> with a $75B valuation, clearly has made its owner some money
Why do you assume that? It's not profitable, it only survives because of outside funding, and thus the owners of the company, are the ones providing the funding, not the guy who decided what the world needs is a better way to generate scummy click-bait content.
> doesn't make it's[sic] owner any money